Temple - Revision history

Odyssee at 07:38, 25 February 2022

2022-02-25T07:38:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:38, 25 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[File:Göbekli Tepe, Urfa.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|[[w:Göbekli Tepe\|Göbekli Tepe]] near [[w:Southeast Anatolia\|southeast Anatolian]] [[w:Şanlıurfa\|Şanlıurfa]] town in present-day [[w:Turkey\|Turkey]] was probably a mountain sanctuary, the oldest layer of which dates to around 9600 BC. It comprises seven stone rings consisting of T-shaped pillars, some with [[relief]]s.<ref>[[w:Klaus Schmidt (archaeologist)\|Klaus Schmidt]]: ''Sie bauten die ersten Tempel. Das rätselhafte Heiligtum der Steinzeitjäger. Die archäologische Entdeckung am Göbekli Tepe''. 3rd, expanded and updated edition 2007. C. H. Beck, Munich 2006, ISBN 3-406-53500-3.</ref>]]
	[[File:Miniaturk 009.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the Temple of Artemis of Ephesus in the [[Wikipedia:Miniatürk\|Miniatürk]] Park [[Wikipedia:Istanbul\|Istanbul]]]]		[[File:Miniaturk 009.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the Temple of Artemis of Ephesus in the [[Wikipedia:Miniatürk\|Miniatürk]] Park [[Wikipedia:Istanbul\|Istanbul]]]]
	[[File:Temple of Solomon.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the [[Temple of Solomon]] with the [[Brazen Sea]] (left) and the central altar (right) in the forecourt.]]		[[File:Temple of Solomon.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the [[Temple of Solomon]] with the [[Brazen Sea]] (left) and the central altar (right) in the forecourt.]]
Line 27:		Line 28:

	{{GA}}		{{GA}}

			== References ==
			<references />

	[[Category:Architecture]]		[[Category:Architecture]]
	[[Category:Temple]]		[[Category:Temple]]
	[[de:Tempel]]		[[de:Tempel]]

Odyssee at 07:02, 25 February 2022

2022-02-25T07:02:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:02, 25 February 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:
	{{GZ\|What, after all, is a temple of the Near East? Where in the world do we find an example of it?		{{GZ\|What, after all, is a temple of the Near East? Where in the world do we find an example of it?

	The example that immediately throws light on what has happened here is given in the following: you think of a human being lying on the ground and raising himself up with his fore body and his face. And in the human being lying on the ground and raising himself up in order to let his body be caught by the higher spiritual forces flowing down, in order to get in touch with them, you have given that which can give the stimulating inspiration for a temple in the Near East. All the pillars, the capitals, all the strange figures of this temple are symbols of what one can feel when one stands face to face with such an erect human being, with all that is revealed in his hand movements, in his gestures and in his ~~countenance~~. If one were to break through this ~~countenance~~ with the spiritual gaze, if one were to penetrate into the interior of the human being, into the microcosm, which is an imprint of the macrocosm, one would find - in so far as the human ~~countenance~~ is a full expression of what is in the interior of the human being, of the microcosm - the same relationship between the human ~~countenance~~ and the interior as between the façade of the temple of the Near East and what was in its interior. An erecting human being is a temple of the Near East; not copied, however, but considered as a motif with all that it stimulates in the soul. In so far as we are physical human beings and human corporeality can be portrayed spiritually through anthroposophy, the temple of the Near East is the expression of the human microcosm. Thus, from the comprehension of the human microcosm with the striving upwards, that part of the human art of building is opened up. This physical human being has his faithful spiritual imprint in those strange temples of which not much more than ruins have survived. In every detail, down to the winged wheel and the archetypes of these things, one would be able to prove that this is so. The times speak to us in loud tones: The temple is man!		The example that immediately throws light on what has happened here is given in the following: you think of a human being lying on the ground and raising himself up with his fore body and his face. And in the human being lying on the ground and raising himself up in order to let his body be caught by the higher spiritual forces flowing down, in order to get in touch with them, you have given that which can give the stimulating inspiration for a temple in the Near East. All the pillars, the capitals, all the strange figures of this temple are symbols of what one can feel when one stands face to face with such an erect human being, with all that is revealed in his hand movements, in his gestures and in his posture. If one were to break through this posture with the spiritual gaze, if one were to penetrate into the interior of the human being, into the microcosm, which is an imprint of the macrocosm, one would find - in so far as the human posture is a full expression of what is in the interior of the human being, of the microcosm - the same relationship between the human posture and the interior as between the façade of the temple of the Near East and what was in its interior. An erecting human being is a temple of the Near East; not copied, however, but considered as a motif with all that it stimulates in the soul. In so far as we are physical human beings and human corporeality can be portrayed spiritually through anthroposophy, the temple of the Near East is the expression of the human microcosm. Thus, from the comprehension of the human microcosm with the striving upwards, that part of the human art of building is opened up. This physical human being has his faithful spiritual imprint in those strange temples of which not much more than ruins have survived. In every detail, down to the winged wheel and the archetypes of these things, one would be able to prove that this is so. The times speak to us in loud tones: The temple is man!

	And the Egyptian and Greek temples?		And the Egyptian and Greek temples?

Odyssee at 16:23, 24 February 2022

2022-02-24T16:23:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 24 February 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:

	We can describe the human being not only from the anthroposophical but also from the psychosophical point of view, from the point of view of the soul. If we approach the human being, in so far as he confronts us on earth in the most essential way as a soul being, then what we observe in his eye, in his face, in his gesture, when we confront the human being, is truly at first a riddle. And how many a person is a great riddle in this respect! Truly, when we approach the human being in this respect, it is no different than when we approach the Egyptian temple, which presents us with the riddle. And when we enter its interior, we find there the holy of holies of the human soul. But we find it only accessible to those who can pass over the outer and enter the inner. A human soul is locked in the innermost cella, like the sanctuary of God, like the mystery secrets themselves in the Egyptian temple, in the Egyptian pyramid. But the soul is not so closed in the human being that it cannot express itself in the gesture, in all that can confront us in the human being. The body can, when the soul penetrates it in its peculiarity, become the outer expression of the soul. Then this human body appears to us as something artistically completed in itself to the highest degree, as something soaked through, as something infinite completed in itself. And look for something in the whole of visible creation that would represent in itself something as complete as the human body is, insofar as it is soaked through: you will find nothing within visible creation - not in relation to dynamism - except the Greek temple, him who so encloses the God in himself, but also serves him as a dwelling place for expression in an infinite that is complete in itself, like the human body of the human soul. And inasmuch as man as microcosm is soul in a body, the Egyptian, is the Greek temple - man.\|286\|22f}}		We can describe the human being not only from the anthroposophical but also from the psychosophical point of view, from the point of view of the soul. If we approach the human being, in so far as he confronts us on earth in the most essential way as a soul being, then what we observe in his eye, in his face, in his gesture, when we confront the human being, is truly at first a riddle. And how many a person is a great riddle in this respect! Truly, when we approach the human being in this respect, it is no different than when we approach the Egyptian temple, which presents us with the riddle. And when we enter its interior, we find there the holy of holies of the human soul. But we find it only accessible to those who can pass over the outer and enter the inner. A human soul is locked in the innermost cella, like the sanctuary of God, like the mystery secrets themselves in the Egyptian temple, in the Egyptian pyramid. But the soul is not so closed in the human being that it cannot express itself in the gesture, in all that can confront us in the human being. The body can, when the soul penetrates it in its peculiarity, become the outer expression of the soul. Then this human body appears to us as something artistically completed in itself to the highest degree, as something soaked through, as something infinite completed in itself. And look for something in the whole of visible creation that would represent in itself something as complete as the human body is, insofar as it is soaked through: you will find nothing within visible creation - not in relation to dynamism - except the Greek temple, him who so encloses the God in himself, but also serves him as a dwelling place for expression in an infinite that is complete in itself, like the human body of the human soul. And inasmuch as man as microcosm is soul in a body, the Egyptian, is the Greek temple - man.\|286\|22f}}

			{{GZ\|We hear of the Temple of Solomon on many occasions as the temple in which we know that the whole spirit of the evolution of humanity was to be expressed. We hear of it; but to the people of the physical earth we ask - and this is the puzzling part of the matter - the quite futile question: who has seen this Temple of Solomon, of which we speak as a grandiose truth - if we speak of it at all seriously - who has seen it with physical eyes? Yes, it is a mystery what I am saying! Herodotus travelled through Egypt and the Near East a few centuries after Solomon's temple was built. From his descriptions of his travels, which are really about much less than what Solomon's Temple must have been, we know that he must have passed by Solomon's Temple only a few miles away - but he did not see it. People had not yet seen the Temple of Solomon!

			The puzzling thing is that I have to talk about something that was there and that the people had not seen. But it is like this. Well, there is also something in nature that can be there and yet people do not see it. But the comparison is not complete, and anyone who wanted to exploit it would miss the mark entirely. It is the plants that are contained in their seed; but people do not see the plants in their seed. But now no one should go further in this comparison, for whoever would now interpret Solomon's temple according to this would immediately say something wrong. As far as I myself have said, the comparison is quite correct, the comparison of the seed of the plant with Solomon's temple.

			What does the temple of Solomon want? It wants the same thing that the temple of the future should want and can want alone.

			One can represent the physical human being in Anthroposophy. One can represent the human being, in so far as he is the temple of the soul itself and is imbued with the soul, in psychosophy. And one can represent the human being through Pneumatosophy, in so far as the human being is spirit. The spiritual man, then, may we not place him before us in such a way that we say: first we behold the man who, lying on the ground, raises himself up; then the man who, closed in upon himself, stands before us like an infinite thing founded in himself, with his eyes straight before him; and then we behold the man who looks upwards, soul-founded in himself, but raising the soul to the spirit and receiving the spirit. "The spirit is spiritual", that is a tautology, but it can nevertheless make clear to us what we have to say: The spirit is the supersensuous, art can only form in the sensuous and express itself in the sensuous in the first place. In other words: What the soul receives as spirit must be able to pour into form. Just as the upright man, the man who has consolidated himself in himself, has become a temple, so the soul must be able to become a temple which receives the spirit. This is what our age is here for, to make a beginning with a temple art that can speak aloud to the people of the future:

			The temple, that is the human being, the human being who receives the spirit in his soul!\|286\|23f}}

	== Literature ==		== Literature ==

Odyssee at 16:17, 24 February 2022

2022-02-24T16:17:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 24 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Miniaturk 009.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the Temple of Artemis of Ephesus in the [[Wikipedia:Miniatürk\|Miniatürk]] Park [[Wikipedia:Istanbul\|Istanbul]]]]		[[File:Miniaturk 009.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the Temple of Artemis of Ephesus in the [[Wikipedia:Miniatürk\|Miniatürk]] Park [[Wikipedia:Istanbul\|Istanbul]]]]
	[[File:Temple of Solomon.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the ~~'''~~Temple of Solomon~~'''~~ with the [[Brazen Sea]] (left) and the central altar (right) in the forecourt.]]		[[File:Temple of Solomon.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the [[Temple of Solomon]] with the [[Brazen Sea]] (left) and the central altar (right) in the forecourt.]]

	A '''temple''' ({{Greek\|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin\|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].		A '''temple''' ({{Greek\|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin\|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].

Odyssee at 16:16, 24 February 2022

2022-02-24T16:16:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 24 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Miniaturk 009.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the Temple of Artemis of Ephesus in the [[Wikipedia:Miniatürk\|Miniatürk]] Park [[Wikipedia:Istanbul\|Istanbul]]]]		[[File:Miniaturk 009.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the Temple of Artemis of Ephesus in the [[Wikipedia:Miniatürk\|Miniatürk]] Park [[Wikipedia:Istanbul\|Istanbul]]]]
			[[File:Temple of Solomon.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the '''Temple of Solomon''' with the [[Brazen Sea]] (left) and the central altar (right) in the forecourt.]]

	A '''temple''' ({{Greek\|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin\|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].		A '''temple''' ({{Greek\|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin\|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].

Odyssee at 16:14, 24 February 2022

2022-02-24T16:14:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, 24 February 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:

	A '''temple''' ({{Greek\|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin\|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].		A '''temple''' ({{Greek\|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin\|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].

			{{GZ\|What, after all, is a temple of the Near East? Where in the world do we find an example of it?

			The example that immediately throws light on what has happened here is given in the following: you think of a human being lying on the ground and raising himself up with his fore body and his face. And in the human being lying on the ground and raising himself up in order to let his body be caught by the higher spiritual forces flowing down, in order to get in touch with them, you have given that which can give the stimulating inspiration for a temple in the Near East. All the pillars, the capitals, all the strange figures of this temple are symbols of what one can feel when one stands face to face with such an erect human being, with all that is revealed in his hand movements, in his gestures and in his countenance. If one were to break through this countenance with the spiritual gaze, if one were to penetrate into the interior of the human being, into the microcosm, which is an imprint of the macrocosm, one would find - in so far as the human countenance is a full expression of what is in the interior of the human being, of the microcosm - the same relationship between the human countenance and the interior as between the façade of the temple of the Near East and what was in its interior. An erecting human being is a temple of the Near East; not copied, however, but considered as a motif with all that it stimulates in the soul. In so far as we are physical human beings and human corporeality can be portrayed spiritually through anthroposophy, the temple of the Near East is the expression of the human microcosm. Thus, from the comprehension of the human microcosm with the striving upwards, that part of the human art of building is opened up. This physical human being has his faithful spiritual imprint in those strange temples of which not much more than ruins have survived. In every detail, down to the winged wheel and the archetypes of these things, one would be able to prove that this is so. The times speak to us in loud tones: The temple is man!

			And the Egyptian and Greek temples?

			We can describe the human being not only from the anthroposophical but also from the psychosophical point of view, from the point of view of the soul. If we approach the human being, in so far as he confronts us on earth in the most essential way as a soul being, then what we observe in his eye, in his face, in his gesture, when we confront the human being, is truly at first a riddle. And how many a person is a great riddle in this respect! Truly, when we approach the human being in this respect, it is no different than when we approach the Egyptian temple, which presents us with the riddle. And when we enter its interior, we find there the holy of holies of the human soul. But we find it only accessible to those who can pass over the outer and enter the inner. A human soul is locked in the innermost cella, like the sanctuary of God, like the mystery secrets themselves in the Egyptian temple, in the Egyptian pyramid. But the soul is not so closed in the human being that it cannot express itself in the gesture, in all that can confront us in the human being. The body can, when the soul penetrates it in its peculiarity, become the outer expression of the soul. Then this human body appears to us as something artistically completed in itself to the highest degree, as something soaked through, as something infinite completed in itself. And look for something in the whole of visible creation that would represent in itself something as complete as the human body is, insofar as it is soaked through: you will find nothing within visible creation - not in relation to dynamism - except the Greek temple, him who so encloses the God in himself, but also serves him as a dwelling place for expression in an infinite that is complete in itself, like the human body of the human soul. And inasmuch as man as microcosm is soul in a body, the Egyptian, is the Greek temple - man.\|286\|22f}}

	== Literature ==		== Literature ==

Odyssee at 16:03, 24 February 2022

2022-02-24T16:03:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:03, 24 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[File:Miniaturk 009.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Model of the Temple of Artemis of Ephesus in the [[Wikipedia:Miniatürk\|Miniatürk]] Park [[Wikipedia:Istanbul\|Istanbul]]]]

	A '''temple''' ({{Greek\|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin\|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].		A '''temple''' ({{Greek\|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin\|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].

Odyssee: Created page with "A '''temple''' ({{Greek|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills o..."

2022-02-24T15:59:05Z

Created page with "A '''temple''' ({{Greek|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills o..."

New page

A '''temple''' ({{Greek|τέμενος}} ''témenos'', {{Latin|templum}} "delimited, enclosed") was originally a delimited sacred area erected in sacred places such as hills or groves in which cultic acts were performed addressed to the deity or deities who had taken up residence there. Later, temple buildings were erected at these sites, ranging from simple mounds of earth to extensive temple districts. The common archetype of all temple forms is the [[body]] of [[man]], which receives the descending spirit in its soul. A perfect example of temple construction was the [[Temple of Solomon]].

== Literature ==

* [[Rudolf Steiner]]: ''Wege zu einem neuen Baustil'', [[GA 286]] (1982), ISBN 3-7274-2860-0 {{Lectures|286}}

{{GA}}

[[Category:Architecture]]
[[Category:Temple]]
[[de:Tempel]]