Phylogenesis - Revision history

Odyssee at 07:35, 14 March 2022

2022-03-14T07:35:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:35, 14 March 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:ErnstHaeckelDW.jpg\|thumb\|[[w:Ernst Haeckel\|Ernst Haeckel]] (1908)]]		[[File:ErnstHaeckelDW.jpg\|thumb\|[[w:Ernst Haeckel\|Ernst Haeckel]] (1908)]]

	'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek\|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang\|grc\|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of the totality of all [[living organism]]s as well as the developmental history of individual kinship groups at all levels of biological systematics and also the [[evolution]] of specific traits. In contrast, [[ontogenesis]] describes the development of single individuals of a [[species]].		'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek\|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang\|grc\|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") or '''phylogeny''' in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of the totality of all [[living organism]]s as well as the developmental history of individual kinship groups at all levels of biological systematics and also the [[evolution]] of specific traits. In contrast, [[ontogenesis]] describes the development of single individuals of a [[species]].

	The basic [[biogenetic law]] formulated by [[w:Ernst Haeckel\|Ernst Haeckel]], according to which ~~ontogenesis~~ recapitulates ~~phylogenesis~~ in an abbreviated form, is today considered to be refuted. [[Rudolf Steiner]] certainly acknowledged the facts underlying this law, but he considered Haeckel's interpretation of these facts to be erroneous:		The basic [[biogenetic law]] formulated by [[w:Ernst Haeckel\|Ernst Haeckel]], according to which [[ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny]] in an abbreviated form, is today considered to be refuted. [[Rudolf Steiner]] certainly acknowledged the facts underlying this law, but he considered Haeckel's interpretation of these facts to be erroneous:

	{{GZ\|The facts are of course correct, because they are observed by the senses. But if we are to judge them, then we have to consider what is the power of the intellectual soul. It cannot approach what cannot be seen sensually. Therefore, if it does not have the disposition to truth within, it is necessarily subject to error. And here we have a glaring example of how the power of judgment, which comes from the intellectual soul, can sail into error [...]		{{GZ\|The facts are of course correct, because they are observed by the senses. But if we are to judge them, then we have to consider what is the power of the intellectual soul. It cannot approach what cannot be seen sensually. Therefore, if it does not have the disposition to truth within, it is necessarily subject to error. And here we have a glaring example of how the power of judgment, which comes from the intellectual soul, can sail into error [...]

Odyssee at 15:08, 11 March 2022

2022-03-11T15:08:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 11 March 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:ErnstHaeckelDW.jpg\|thumb\|[[Ernst Haeckel]] (1908)]]		[[File:ErnstHaeckelDW.jpg\|thumb\|[[w:Ernst Haeckel\|Ernst Haeckel]] (1908)]]

	'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek\|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang\|grc\|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of the totality of all [[living organism]]s as well as the developmental history of individual kinship groups at all levels of biological systematics and also the [[evolution]] of specific traits. In contrast, [[ontogenesis]] describes the development of single individuals of a [[species]].		'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek\|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang\|grc\|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of the totality of all [[living organism]]s as well as the developmental history of individual kinship groups at all levels of biological systematics and also the [[evolution]] of specific traits. In contrast, [[ontogenesis]] describes the development of single individuals of a [[species]].

	The basic [[biogenetic law]] formulated by [[Ernst Haeckel]], according to which ontogenesis recapitulates phylogenesis in an abbreviated form, is today considered to be refuted. [[Rudolf Steiner]] certainly acknowledged the facts underlying this law, but he considered Haeckel's interpretation of these facts to be erroneous:		The basic [[biogenetic law]] formulated by [[w:Ernst Haeckel\|Ernst Haeckel]], according to which ontogenesis recapitulates phylogenesis in an abbreviated form, is today considered to be refuted. [[Rudolf Steiner]] certainly acknowledged the facts underlying this law, but he considered Haeckel's interpretation of these facts to be erroneous:

	{{GZ\|The facts are of course correct, because they are observed by the senses. But if we are to judge them, then we have to consider what is the power of the intellectual soul. It cannot approach what cannot be seen sensually. Therefore, if it does not have the disposition to truth within, it is necessarily subject to error. And here we have a glaring example of how the power of judgment, which comes from the intellectual soul, can sail into error [...]		{{GZ\|The facts are of course correct, because they are observed by the senses. But if we are to judge them, then we have to consider what is the power of the intellectual soul. It cannot approach what cannot be seen sensually. Therefore, if it does not have the disposition to truth within, it is necessarily subject to error. And here we have a glaring example of how the power of judgment, which comes from the intellectual soul, can sail into error [...]

Odyssee at 14:31, 11 March 2022

2022-03-11T14:31:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 11 March 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[File:ErnstHaeckelDW.jpg\|thumb\|[[Ernst Haeckel]] (1908)]]

	'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek\|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang\|grc\|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of the totality of all [[living organism]]s as well as the developmental history of individual kinship groups at all levels of biological systematics and also the [[evolution]] of specific traits. In contrast, [[ontogenesis]] describes the development of single individuals of a [[species]].		'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek\|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang\|grc\|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of the totality of all [[living organism]]s as well as the developmental history of individual kinship groups at all levels of biological systematics and also the [[evolution]] of specific traits. In contrast, [[ontogenesis]] describes the development of single individuals of a [[species]].

Odyssee: Created page with "'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang|grc|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of t..."

2022-03-11T13:58:50Z

Created page with "'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang|grc|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of t..."

New page

'''Phylogenesis''' (from {{Greek|φῦλον}} ''phýlon'' "stem" and {{lang|grc|γένεσις}} ''génesis'' "origin") in biology refers to the phylogenetic development of the totality of all [[living organism]]s as well as the developmental history of individual kinship groups at all levels of biological systematics and also the [[evolution]] of specific traits. In contrast, [[ontogenesis]] describes the development of single individuals of a [[species]].

The basic [[biogenetic law]] formulated by [[Ernst Haeckel]], according to which ontogenesis recapitulates phylogenesis in an abbreviated form, is today considered to be refuted. [[Rudolf Steiner]] certainly acknowledged the facts underlying this law, but he considered Haeckel's interpretation of these facts to be erroneous:

{{GZ|The facts are of course correct, because they are observed by the senses. But if we are to judge them, then we have to consider what is the power of the intellectual soul. It cannot approach what cannot be seen sensually. Therefore, if it does not have the disposition to truth within, it is necessarily subject to error. And here we have a glaring example of how the power of judgment, which comes from the intellectual soul, can sail into error [...]

What then does the fact show that man at a certain stage of his germinal life looks like a little fish? This fact shows that man cannot use that which is fish-shaped, that he had to expel it before he began his human existence. And the next germ form is again one that man had to expel because it does not belong to him, just as man had to expel all animal forms because they do not belong to him. Man could not have become man if he had ever appeared on earth in such a form as these animal forms are. He just had to separate them from himself, so that he could become man. If you follow these thoughts in the right way, you will also come to a right judgment. What do the facts show that man in the germ stage, for example, looks like a little fish? These facts show that he has never looked like a little fish in the course of his line of descent, that he has rejected the fish form in the very line of his development, that he could not use it because he was not allowed to look like it. Now take all the other successive forms which modern science shows you in the forms of germ life. What do these forms show? They show everything that man was not in prehistoric times, that he had to expel from himself. They show all those images which he has never seen similar. Thus one can learn in truth by the embryology, how man never looked in the prehistoric times [...] Just the reverse order of the evolution was assumed by the sailing into the error, by the fact that the mind has really proved quite unsuitable to think through these facts of the reality truthfully. Certainly these pictures of the past are extraordinarily important for us, because we recognize precisely by them how we have never looked.|115|81ff}}

According to Rudolf Steiner, man was not only ''ontogentically'', but also ''phylogenetically'' man from the very beginning - admittedly not in his present form. He developed to his today's form just by the fact that he eliminated the animal forms in the course of the phylogenesis little by little from his being. In this sense not man descends from the animal, but rather vice versa the animals from the man.

== Literature ==

* [[Rudolf Steiner]]: ''Anthroposophie, Psychosophie, Pneumatosophie'', GA 115 (1980), Vierter Vortrag, Berlin, 27. Oktober 1909 {{Lectures|115}}

{{GA}}

[[Category:Biology]]
[[de:Phylogenese]]