Emergence - Revision history

Odyssee at 15:08, 30 January 2022

2022-01-30T15:08:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 30 January 2022
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Carl Gustav Hempel]] and [[Paul Oppenheim]], in their article ''Studies in the Logic of Explanation''<ref>Carl Gustav Hempel, Paul Oppenheim: ''Studies in the Logic of Explanation'', in: ''Philosophy of Science'' 15 (1948), 135–175; reproduced in Hempel: ''Aspects of Scientific Explanation''; [http://www.sfu.ca/~jillmc/Hempel%20and%20Oppenheim.pdf pdf]</ref> published in 1948, characterise emergence according to their deductive-nomological model as follows:		[[Carl Gustav Hempel]] and [[Paul Oppenheim]], in their article ''Studies in the Logic of Explanation''<ref>Carl Gustav Hempel, Paul Oppenheim: ''Studies in the Logic of Explanation'', in: ''Philosophy of Science'' 15 (1948), 135–175; reproduced in Hempel: ''Aspects of Scientific Explanation''; [http://www.sfu.ca/~jillmc/Hempel%20and%20Oppenheim.pdf pdf]</ref> published in 1948, characterise emergence according to their deductive-nomological model as follows:

	{{~~Qote~~\|Generally speaking, the concept of emergence has been used to characterize certain phenomena as "novel", and this not merely in the psychological sense of being unexpected, but in the theoretical sense of being unexplainable, or unpredictable, on the basis of information concerning the spatial parts or other constituents of the systems in which the phenomena occur, and which in this context are often referred to as wholes. Thus, e.g., such characteristics of water as its transparence and liquidity at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, or its ability to quench thirst have been considered as emergent on the ground that they could not possibly have been predicted from a knowledge of the properties of its chemical constituents, hydrogen and oxygen. The weight of the compound, on the contrary, has been said not to be emergent because it is a mere "resultant" of its components and could have been predicted by simple addition even before the compound had been formed.\|Hempel, Oppenheim\|''Studies in the Logic of Explanation'', p. 147}}		{{Quote\|Generally speaking, the concept of emergence has been used to characterize certain phenomena as "novel", and this not merely in the psychological sense of being unexpected, but in the theoretical sense of being unexplainable, or unpredictable, on the basis of information concerning the spatial parts or other constituents of the systems in which the phenomena occur, and which in this context are often referred to as wholes. Thus, e.g., such characteristics of water as its transparence and liquidity at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, or its ability to quench thirst have been considered as emergent on the ground that they could not possibly have been predicted from a knowledge of the properties of its chemical constituents, hydrogen and oxygen. The weight of the compound, on the contrary, has been said not to be emergent because it is a mere "resultant" of its components and could have been predicted by simple addition even before the compound had been formed.\|Hempel, Oppenheim\|''Studies in the Logic of Explanation'', p. 147}}

	== Literature ==		== Literature ==

Odyssee at 15:06, 30 January 2022

2022-01-30T15:06:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 30 January 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:

	{{LZ\|Among the most puzzling and yet fundamental phenomena of the universe is emergence: the appearance of new properties at each higher level of complexity that could not have been foreseen at the preceding level. An example: the characteristics of life cannot be derived from inanimate matter. Regardless of how far one pushes research in physics and chemistry, one will never be able to predict the specific behaviour of living organisms in this way. It seems to be a universal principle that the (more complex) whole cannot be traced back to its (simpler) parts. No level of increasing complexity is exempt from this. At the level of atoms: When the hydrogen and oxygen atoms are considered in isolation, nothing points to the properties of a water molecule. Or at the end of the scale: The characteristics of consciousness do not result from the extrapolation of behaviour.\|Kiefer, p. 33}}		{{LZ\|Among the most puzzling and yet fundamental phenomena of the universe is emergence: the appearance of new properties at each higher level of complexity that could not have been foreseen at the preceding level. An example: the characteristics of life cannot be derived from inanimate matter. Regardless of how far one pushes research in physics and chemistry, one will never be able to predict the specific behaviour of living organisms in this way. It seems to be a universal principle that the (more complex) whole cannot be traced back to its (simpler) parts. No level of increasing complexity is exempt from this. At the level of atoms: When the hydrogen and oxygen atoms are considered in isolation, nothing points to the properties of a water molecule. Or at the end of the scale: The characteristics of consciousness do not result from the extrapolation of behaviour.\|Kiefer, p. 33}}

			[[Carl Gustav Hempel]] and [[Paul Oppenheim]], in their article ''Studies in the Logic of Explanation''<ref>Carl Gustav Hempel, Paul Oppenheim: ''Studies in the Logic of Explanation'', in: ''Philosophy of Science'' 15 (1948), 135–175; reproduced in Hempel: ''Aspects of Scientific Explanation''; [http://www.sfu.ca/~jillmc/Hempel%20and%20Oppenheim.pdf pdf]</ref> published in 1948, characterise emergence according to their deductive-nomological model as follows:

			{{Qote\|Generally speaking, the concept of emergence has been used to characterize certain phenomena as "novel", and this not merely in the psychological sense of being unexpected, but in the theoretical sense of being unexplainable, or unpredictable, on the basis of information concerning the spatial parts or other constituents of the systems in which the phenomena occur, and which in this context are often referred to as wholes. Thus, e.g., such characteristics of water as its transparence and liquidity at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, or its ability to quench thirst have been considered as emergent on the ground that they could not possibly have been predicted from a knowledge of the properties of its chemical constituents, hydrogen and oxygen. The weight of the compound, on the contrary, has been said not to be emergent because it is a mere "resultant" of its components and could have been predicted by simple addition even before the compound had been formed.\|Hempel, Oppenheim\|''Studies in the Logic of Explanation'', p. 147}}

			== Literature ==

	* [[Aristotle]]: ''Metaphysik''. Übersetzt von Thomas A. Szlezak, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 2003, ISBN 978-3-05-003879-7		* [[Aristotle]]: ''Metaphysik''. Übersetzt von Thomas A. Szlezak, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 2003, ISBN 978-3-05-003879-7
Line 26:		Line 32:

	{{GA}}		{{GA}}

			== Rewferences ==
			<references />

	[[Category:Philosophy of science]]		[[Category:Philosophy of science]]

Odyssee: Created page with "'''Emergence''' (from {{Latin|emergere}} "to appear, to come forth, to show itself") is the term used today to describe the phenomenon that some spontaneously and unpredictabl..."

2022-01-30T14:49:29Z

Created page with "'''Emergence''' (from {{Latin|emergere}} "to appear, to come forth, to show itself") is the term used today to describe the phenomenon that some spontaneously and unpredictabl..."

New page

'''Emergence''' (from {{Latin|emergere}} "to appear, to come forth, to show itself") is the term used today to describe the phenomenon that some spontaneously and unpredictably occurring properties of a structured system cannot be explained by its parts alone. The Austrian behavioural biologist Konrad Lorenz had instead proposed the term '''fulguration''' (from {{Latin|fulgur}} "lightning") to clearly indicate that in this process, not already existing but previously hidden properties "emerge", as the German translation of the word emergence suggests, but actually spontaneously emerge completely new.

The supersummativity, according to which the whole is more than its parts, was first pointed out in philosophical clarity by [[Aristotle]]:

{{Quote|That which is so composed of constituent parts as to form a unified whole is not after the manner of a heap, but like a syllable, that is evidently more than merely the sum of its parts. A syllable is not the sum of its sounds: ba is not the same as b plus a, and flesh is not the same as fire plus earth.|Aristotle|''Metaphysics'', Book 8.6. 1045a: 8-10.}}

The '''emergence theory''' was developed by the British philosophers [[w:Samuel Alexander|Samuel Alexander]] (1859-1938) and [[w:Conwy Lloyd Morgan|Conwy Lloyd Morgan]] (1852-1936), who regarded the formation of [[consciousness]] as an [[evolution]]ary phenomenon that could not be adequately explained [[biologically]]. Another important representative of '''emergence philosophy''' or '''emergentism''', whose findings are again attracting increasing attention in the philosophy of mind today, is [[C. D. Broad]] (1887-1971).

However, the [[phenomenon]] of emergence is much broader than this and is not limited to the emergence of consciousness.

{{LZ|Among the most puzzling and yet fundamental phenomena of the universe is emergence: the appearance of new properties at each higher level of complexity that could not have been foreseen at the preceding level. An example: the characteristics of life cannot be derived from inanimate matter. Regardless of how far one pushes research in physics and chemistry, one will never be able to predict the specific behaviour of living organisms in this way. It seems to be a universal principle that the (more complex) whole cannot be traced back to its (simpler) parts. No level of increasing complexity is exempt from this. At the level of atoms: When the hydrogen and oxygen atoms are considered in isolation, nothing points to the properties of a water molecule. Or at the end of the scale: The characteristics of consciousness do not result from the extrapolation of behaviour.|Kiefer, p. 33}}

* [[Aristotle]]: ''Metaphysik''. Übersetzt von Thomas A. Szlezak, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 2003, ISBN 978-3-05-003879-7
* [[Aristotle]]: ''Metaphysik'', übersetzt und kommentiert von Hans G. Zekl, Königshausen & Neumann, 2003, ISBN 978-3-8260-2555-6
* W. D. Ross: ''Aristotle’s Metaphysics''. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2. A. 1953. <small>Mit umfangreichem Kommentar</small>
* [[Hans Primas]]: ''Umdenken in der Naturwissenschaft'' in: ''Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich'' (1992) 137/l, S. 41-62 (genehmigter Nachdruck aus «GAIA; Ecological Perspectives in Science, Humanities and Economics» (1992) 1, l, 5-15 [http://www.ngzh.ch/archiv/1992_137/137_1/137_5.pdf pdf]
* [[Robert Betts Laughlin]]: ''A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics From the Bottom Down'', New Edition, Basic Books 2006, ISBN 978-0465038299, eBook {{ASIN|B06XCHFW1S}}
** deutsch: ''Abschied von der Weltformel: Die Neuerfindung der Physik'', Piper Verlag 2007, ISBN 978-3492047180
* [[Marek B. Majorek]]: ''Rudolf Steiners Geisteswissenschaft: Mythisches Denken oder Wissenschaft?'', 2 Bände, Verlag Narr Francke Attempto, Tübingen 2015, ISBN 978-3772085635, eBook: ASIN B0714F4N5R
* Bernhard Kiefer: ''Das Prinzip der Emergenz''. Schweizerischer Nationalfonds. Horizonte 2007
* [[Brigitte Falkenburg]]: ''Mythos Determinismus: Wieviel erklärt uns die Hirnforschung?'', Springer-Verlag 2012; ISBN 978-3642250972; eBook {{ASIN| B00A9YG6J6}}
* [[Thomas Görnitz|Thomas]] und [[Brigitte Görnitz]]: ''Von der Quantenphysik zum Bewusstsein - Kosmos, Geist und Materie.'' Springer-Verlag, Berlin/ Heidelberg, 2016, ISBN 978-3-662-49081-5.
* Hermann Helbig: ''Welträtsel aus Sicht der modernen Wissenschaften. Emergenz in Natur, Gesellschaft, Psychologie,Technik und Religion'', Springer Verlag 2018, ISBN 978-3-662-56287-1, eBook ISBN 978-3-662-56288-8
* [[Peter Heusser]]: ''Anthroposophie und Wissenschaft: Eine Einführung. Erkenntniswissenschaft, Physik, Chemie, Genetik, Biologie, Neurobiologie, Psychologie, Philosophie des Geistes, Anthropologie, Anthroposophie, Medizin'', Verlag am Goetheanum, Dornach 2016, ISBN 978-3723515686
* [[Rudolf Steiner]]: ''Mysteriengestaltungen'', [[GA 232]] (1998), ISBN 3-7274-2321-8 {{Lectures|232}}

{{GA}}

[[Category:Philosophy of science]]
[[Category:Philosophy of mind]]
[[Category:Epistemology]]
[[Category:Natural science]]
[[de:Emergenz]]